[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Pkg-octave-devel] [RFU] octave-interval 3.1.0-1



On 27.12.2017 07:50, Oliver Heimlich wrote:
> On 27.12.2017 06:37, Oliver Heimlich wrote:
>> Am 26. Dezember 2017 22:03:52 MEZ schrieb "Sébastien Villemot"
<sebastien@debian.org>:
>>> The last problem is that the autopkgtest fails badly, and it is not
>>> immediately
>>> clear to me why. I nevertheless made the upload because we need to fix
>>> the RC
>>> bugs. Please have a look at the autopkgtest logs when they appear (or
>>> even
>>> better, try to run them locally) and fix the problems in the next
>>> upload.

> Apparently, the inst/test folder is missing in the .deb package.  It
> should have been installed to /usr/share/.

I have fixed the missing test data.

> Also, I can find a failing test in mpfr_matrix_mul_d.cc, where
> multi-thread performance is measured and compared against single-thread
> execution.  Probably, the Debian tests servers can't provide an
> environment where this can be tested in a reliable way.

I have made it an xtest.

On 29.12.2017 00:09, Oliver Heimlich wrote:
> On 28.12.2017 18:01, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
>> Note that octave-interval FTBFS on armel:
>>
>>  https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=octave-interval&arch=armel&ver=3.1.0-1&stamp=1514325840&raw=0
>>
>> There are two options: the preferred one is of course to fix the build; the
>> alternative is to request the removal of the binary on armel.

I have decided to simply ignore the test result of __setround__ and make
it an xtest on all platforms for now.

This should fix all known problems for now and we can try a new upload.
@Rafael: Should we combine it with an update to octave-pkg-dev or would
that be to early?

Oliver

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: