Re: [Pkg-octave-devel] First builds of octave-interval: the good, the bad, the ugly
On 05.02.2016 23:45, Oliver Heimlich wrote:
> [hppa, powerpc, ppc64, s390x]
> - bit(un)pack functions don't work as expected -> looks like
> little/big-endian confusion
…
> Can I
> reproduce the little-big-endian issue with qemu? If so I will try to fix
> it,
…
Okay, there is no need to reproduce this. The output from the build
script was enough to detect that the functions work as expected but the
tests assume a big-endian system. I could easily fix the tests upstream
to work on both, little-endian and big-endian.
Best
Oliver
Reply to: