[Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#798427: marked as done (jessie-backports FTBFS: missing build-dep on bison)
Your message dated Thu, 31 Dec 2015 00:00:08 +0100
with message-id <20151230230008.GF32647@laboissiere.net>
and subject line Re: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#798427: jessie-backports FTBFS: missing build-dep on bison
has caused the Debian Bug report #798427,
regarding jessie-backports FTBFS: missing build-dep on bison
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
798427: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=798427
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: octave
Version: 4.0.0-4
Severity: minor
Hi,
when building octave from sid in a jessie chroot in order to do a
jessie-backport, octave FTBFS within configure that bison is not installed.
Would you mind adding a direct build-depends on bison to ease backports?
Since octave doesn't FTBFS on sid, i presume that bison is pulled
indirectly, so a direct build-depends wouldn't hurt either.
Regards,
Daniel
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
* Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-technologies.com> [2015-09-09 10:40]:
Package: octave
Version: 4.0.0-4
Severity: minor
when building octave from sid in a jessie chroot in order to do a
jessie-backport, octave FTBFS within configure that bison is not
installed.
Would you mind adding a direct build-depends on bison to ease backports?
Since octave doesn't FTBFS on sid, i presume that bison is pulled
indirectly, so a direct build-depends wouldn't hurt either.
I am hereby closing this bug report. Quoting a comment from Sébastien
Villemot in the pkg-octave-devel mailing list [1]:
"Actually the BTS does not know about backports, and should not be used
for reporting problems with the backports. So #798427 should have not
been opened in the first place (except if the problem was affecting a
version in stable/testing/unstable)."
Moreover, Sébastien and I tried to build the package in jessie chroots
and could not reproduce the bug.
At any rate, I hope that we will be able to upload octave 4.0.0 to
jessie-backports soon.
Best,
Rafael
[1] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-octave-devel/2015-December/011949.html
--- End Message ---
Reply to: