Le mardi 29 décembre 2015 à 19:11 +0100, Rafael Laboissiere a écrit : > I succeeded to build the octave package in a clean jessie chroot, so > I > prepared the upload to jessie-backports in Git [commit 28917f4]. > Note > that, for doing this, I created a branch called jessie-backports, > which > was derived from the debian/4.0.0-5 tag. First note that I fixed the version number for the backport. The right suffix for jessie-backports is ~bpo8+1. See http://backports.debian.org /Contribute/ If you want to be sure to get it right, you can use "dch --bpo". However I was not able to build the package. I got a segfault in the __osmesa_print__.cc test. See the attached build log. The error occurred when building with sbuild. I did not try with pbuilder. If you have trouble reproducing it, please let me know, and I'll investigate with my own setup. > Notice also that I could not reproduce Bug#798427. At any rate, if > the > upload goes well, I think we can close that bug report. Also, there > is > Bug#793107, which is still open and will become obsolete with the > upload > to jessie-backports. Actually the BTS does not know about backports, and should not be used for reporting problems with the backports. So #798427 should have not been opened in the first place (except if the problem was affecting a version in stable/testing/unstable). IMHO it can be closed right now. For #793107, there are two options. Either we plan to fix it in stable, and we have to wait for that fix before closing it (but I'm not sure this bug is worth a stable update). Or we don't plan to fix it in stable, and we can close it now, since it is fixed in unstable. At any rate, jessie-backports has nothing to do with it. Cheers, -- .''`. Sébastien Villemot : :' : Debian Developer `. `' http://sebastien.villemot.name `- GPG Key: 4096R/381A7594
Attachment:
octave_4.0.0-5~bpo8+1_amd64-20151230-1203.build.xz
Description: application/xz
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part