Re: [Pkg-octave-devel] Hello, some doubts and ideas
Hello Andreu,
Thanks for your message.
* Andreu Correa Casablanca <castarco@gmail.com> [2015-04-22 11:09]:
I'm working on a proposal to improve the Octave's package management system
(pkg.m) to make it more flexible. I've recently discovered this group while
doing a little bit of research, and I think it would be interesting to know
your opinions before and after the proposal is written in the Octave's wiki.
In which framework will you develop your project? Will you do it under
the supervision of the Octave upstream authors? I am asking these
questions because we (the DOG) usually adapt ourselves to whichever
design decisions are taken upstream, and not the other way around.
I've seen you are using a package (octave-pkg-dev) to make easier
creating Octave's packages for Debian. Since it's probable that my
proposal will introduce backwards incompatibilities, I think it's very
important to do it with your agreement and taking into account your
advices.
The octave-pkg-dev package was created in order to automate the creation
of Octave-Forge packages for Debian. It is a collection of hacks based
on CDBS and using calls to the pkg command, essentially collected into a
single Makefile (octave-pkg.mk). Even though it has been pretty
successful since its inception, the creation of the octave-pkg-dev
package was not based on a clear and well thought design.
So, I think that we will have to adapt anyway to any future changes in
the behavior of the pkg command.
One of my ideas is to add another "per-project" packages in addition to
the global and local packages.
Another idea is to handle every "project" (a directory with Octave
code) as a package itself ("anonymous" package if there isn't metadata
available, and named package if the metadata is available). This point
may introduce subtle changes in the package directory structure.
I have some difficulties in understanding designs without seeing actual
code and how it acts. In particular, I cannot tell how the changes above
would affect the Debian packaging.
I would say, then, go ahead with your project and we will catch up later.
Best,
Rafael
Reply to: