Le mardi 10 juin 2014 à 09:15 +0200, Thomas Weber a écrit : > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 08:26:00PM +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote: > > I have created the following page: > > > > https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DebianOctaveGroup/UploadersField > > > > If you agree with this idea, please add a column for yourself and tick > > the packages that you are interested in. > > I don't quite know how to fill this for my situation. I don't use Octave > at all anymore for work, so in that sense, I am not interested in any > package. Then again, I try to do at least some work here to not lose all > skills in the area. Thanks Thomas for your feedback. So I understand that you prefer not to be listed in the Uploaders field of any package, though you may still do team uploads. So, out of the 54 packages maintained by the DOG, 29 have at least one person (out of Mike, Rafael and myself) interested in maintaining them. For those 29 packages, I therefore suggest to update the Uploaders field in git according to the wiki page. Is that ok? Then, for the remaining 25 packages, we have to find another solution. Among those, 5 packages (benchmark, mapping, nnet, octgpr, plot) are marked as unmaintained upstream (see http://octave.sourceforge.net/packages.php), so I guess we could request their removal. That leaves us with 20 packages to be adopted. I see two possible solutions: either list all team members in the Uploaders field, or distribute packages randomly across team members. I guess the former solution is better. What do you think? -- .''`. Sébastien Villemot : :' : Debian Developer `. `' http://www.dynare.org/sebastien `- GPG Key: 4096R/381A7594
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part