Le mercredi 11 décembre 2013 à 12:34 +0100, Rafael Laboissiere a écrit : > * Sébastien Villemot <sebastien@debian.org> [2013-12-11 12:24]: > > I am not sure this is worth the effort. The only benefit of splitting > > the package is that people with low disk space will not be forced to > > install Qt. That does not seem like a huge gain. > > It is also a matter of RAM, since octave-gui, when launched, will load > the whole Qt libraries into memory, which is undesirable for batch > processes. Sure, but this is not relevant for our discussion. If we don't split the octave package, there will still be an octave-cli binary shipped in the octave package. So splitting the packages is really only about disk space. -- .''`. Sébastien Villemot : :' : Debian Developer `. `' http://www.dynare.org/sebastien `- GPG Key: 4096R/381A7594
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part