Rafael Laboissiere <rafael@laboissiere.net> writes: > * Sébastien Villemot <sebastien.villemot@ens.fr> [2012-06-04 11:24]: > >> Rafael Laboissiere <rafael@laboissiere.net> writes: >> >> > I Git-pushed the changes for the new upstream version of the control >> > package (2.351), released today. >> >> I get test failures in ltimodels and @lti/minreal. >> >> Looks like other people can reproduce it (see the thread on Octave-Forge >> mailing list). >> >> Do you think we should upload in spite of the failures? > > I think you should upload it. The failures were already there in version > 2.3.50 (e.g. http://goo.gl/glVMO). I got no test failure when building with pbuilder, probably because the test were run there with the reference BLAS implementation (as mentionned on the Octave-Forge list). However, I have another unrelated issue. Due to the recent uploads of blas and lapack in unstable (which changed the naming schemes of BLAS/LAPACK libraries), I am unable to co-install the new octave-control that I compiled with the existing octave package. Hence I cannot do any testing of the new package. I am quite confused about this change of naming scheme of BLAS/LAPACK just before the freeze, and I don't find any explanation on mailing lists / wiki. I am going to ask on irc. -- Sébastien Villemot Researcher in Economics & Debian Maintainer http://www.dynare.org/sebastien Phone: +33-1-40-77-84-04 - GPG Key: 4096R/381A7594
Attachment:
pgpiGZ7ddLJVo.pgp
Description: PGP signature