Rafael Laboissiere <rafael@laboissiere.net> writes: > * Sébastien Villemot <sebastien.villemot@ens.fr> [2012-08-14 11:34]: > >> Rafael Laboissiere <rafael@laboissiere.net> writes: >> >> > * Sébastien Villemot <sebastien.villemot@ens.fr> [2012-08-14 09:53]: >> >> To summarize, my feeling is that allowing the co-instability of >> >> liboctave-dev with all 3 versions of HDF5 brings clear advantages (less >> >> co-instability issues) and at the same time it won't break anything for >> >> people using the serial HDF5 version. People wanting to use the parallel >> >> versions will be allowed to do so; in the worst case they could be hit >> >> by the partial ABI-incompatibility, but it is still better than the >> >> current situation where we just forbid them from using the parallel >> >> version. >> > >> > I agree with your conclusion. What should we do now? Fill the RC bug >> > report and go ahead with the change in the master branch? >> >> I am not sure this issue is of RC severity, in my view it is even of >> wishlist severity. > > I would say it is at least of normal severity, since there is a > regression from squeeze. Agreed. >> I would rather directly file a bug against release.debian.org asking for >> pre-approval, using the text that you wrote and attaching the patch. >> Then, if the Release Team agrees, we commit to master and upload to >> unstable. > > Ok, I will file the bug report later today. Thanks. -- .''`. Sébastien Villemot : :' : Debian Maintainer `. `' http://www.dynare.org/sebastien `- GPG Key: 4096R/381A7594
Attachment:
pgp3qXvxi49_U.pgp
Description: PGP signature