[Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#513547: marked as done (octave3.0: Use the KDE science submenu instead?)
Your message dated Sat, 2 May 2009 09:12:57 +0200
with message-id <20090502071257.GA14614@atlan>
and subject line Re: Bug#513547: octave3.0: Use the KDE science submenu instead?
has caused the Debian Bug report #513547,
regarding octave3.0: Use the KDE science submenu instead?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
513547: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=513547
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: octave3.0: Use the KDE science submenu instead?
- From: Torquil Macdonald Sørensen <torquil@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:15:43 +0100
- Message-id: <20090130001543.5185.18204.reportbug@localhost>
Package: octave3.0
Version: 1:3.0.1-6lenny1
Severity: minor
GNU Octave has a menu entry in the "Development" submenu in KDE. Wouldn't it
be better to place it in the Science submenu?
Best regards,
Torquil Sørensen
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages octave3.0 depends on:
ii libblas3gf [libblas.so 1.2-2 Basic Linear Algebra Subroutines 3
ii libc6 2.7-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libcurl3-gnutls 7.18.2-8 Multi-protocol file transfer libra
ii libfftw3-3 3.1.2-3.1 library for computing Fast Fourier
ii libgcc1 1:4.3.3-3 GCC support library
ii libgfortran3 4.3.3-3 Runtime library for GNU Fortran ap
ii libglpk0 4.29-2 linear programming kit with intege
ii libhdf5-serial-1.6.6-0 1.6.6-4 Hierarchical Data Format 5 (HDF5)
ii liblapack3gf [liblapac 3.1.1-6 library of linear algebra routines
ii libncurses5 5.7+20090124-1 shared libraries for terminal hand
ii libpcre3 7.8-2 Perl 5 Compatible Regular Expressi
ii libqhull5 2003.1-11 calculate convex hulls and related
ii libreadline5 5.2-3.1 GNU readline and history libraries
ii libstdc++6 4.3.3-3 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii libsuitesparse-3.1.0 1:3.1.0-3.1 collection of libraries for comput
ii texinfo 4.11.dfsg.1-4 Documentation system for on-line i
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-12 compression library - runtime
Versions of packages octave3.0 recommends:
pn gnuplot <none> (no description available)
pn libatlas3gf-base <none> (no description available)
Versions of packages octave3.0 suggests:
pn octave3.0-doc <none> (no description available)
pn octave3.0-emacsen <none> (no description available)
pn octave3.0-headers <none> (no description available)
ii octave3.0-htmldoc 1:3.0.1-6lenny1 HTML documentation on the GNU Octa
ii octave3.0-info 1:3.0.1-6lenny1 GNU Info documentation on the GNU
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 513547-done@bugs.debian.org, Torquil Macdonald S�rensen <torquil@gmail.com>
- Subject: Re: Bug#513547: octave3.0: Use the KDE science submenu instead?
- From: Thomas Weber <thomas.weber.mail@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 09:12:57 +0200
- Message-id: <20090502071257.GA14614@atlan>
- In-reply-to: <20090309202832.GB4714@debian>
- References: <20090130001543.5185.18204.reportbug@localhost> <20090130110815.GC29123@pc049-u864.lyon.inserm.fr> <18819.20582.393506.421371@segfault.lan> <20090309202832.GB4714@debian>
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 09:28:32PM +0100, Thomas Weber wrote:
> If I understand the list at
> http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/apa.html
> correctly, than there is nothing to do here. The Categories list is
> correct.[1]
>
> BTW, Octave is used as an example in that spec, but I disagree with
> their choice of categories (if only because they are violating their own
> rule about main categories).
>
> Thomas
>
> [1] One might argue that 'education' should appear somewhere, but that
> is debatable.
I'm closing this bug. The .desktop entries are as good as they can be.
What menu managers make out of this is their responsibility.
Thomas
--- End Message ---
Reply to: