Re: [Pkg-octave-devel] Choosing a sensible name for a new package split from octave3.0
* Rafael Laboissiere <rafael@debian.org> [2008-09-15 11:25]:
> * Rafael Laboissiere <rafael@debian.org> [2008-09-15 11:02]:
>
> > Thanks for your replies. I think we are leaning towards octave3.0-common.
> > This was also the suggestion of Thomas Weber in a thread in
> > pkg-octave-devel. Otherwise, octave3.0-scripts would be a good name if the
> > package contained only scripts, but this is not going to be the case.
>
> I started to work on this. The changes should be committed soon.
It took a while because I have been over swamped these last days. It should
be committed today or tomorrow.
--
Rafael
Reply to: