Re: [Pkg-octave-devel] Choosing a sensible name for a new package split from octave3.0
* Rafael Laboissiere <rafael@debian.org> [2008-09-15 11:02]:
> Thanks for your replies. I think we are leaning towards octave3.0-common.
> This was also the suggestion of Thomas Weber in a thread in
> pkg-octave-devel. Otherwise, octave3.0-scripts would be a good name if the
> package contained only scripts, but this is not going to be the case.
I started to work on this. The changes should be committed soon.
--
Rafael
Reply to: