Re: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#463039: why does octave3.0 provide: octave2.9?

[Thomas Weber <thomas.weber.mail@gmail.com>]

Am Dienstag, den 05.02.2008, 12:22 +0100 schrieb Rafael Laboissiere:
> * Thomas Weber <thomas.weber.mail@gmail.com> [2008-02-05 09:33]:
> 
> > I'm for the the dummy 2.9 package. It has the added advantage of getting
> > rid of the "octave" package in a sensible way (we simply don't build it
> > anymore). 
> 
> Okay, if there are no further objections, I will soon implement the dummy
> 2.9 packages.  This means that we will have to use the infamous epoch again.

Only for the octave2.9 packages, or do I misunderstand something?

	Thomas