* Thomas Weber <thomas.weber.mail@gmail.com> [2008-02-05 09:33]: > I'm for the the dummy 2.9 package. It has the added advantage of getting > rid of the "octave" package in a sensible way (we simply don't build it > anymore). Okay, if there are no further objections, I will soon implement the dummy 2.9 packages. This means that we will have to use the infamous epoch again. -- Rafael