Re: [Pkg-octave-devel] fw: gfortran transition release goal proposal
On Thursday 26 July 2007 2:31 am, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Rafael Laboissiere <rafael@debian.org> (24/07/2007):
> > Thanks for your comments, I really appreciate them. Once you are
> > done, please post the summary here and also to debian-toolchain and
> > debian-release.
>
> Before posting there (where I'm still waiting for an answer about
> gfortran-4.1 status), here is a quick summary of what I've found WRT to
> our B-D:
> - we B-D on atlas3, which pulls g77; I then tried to get rid of g77 in
> this package;
> - atlas3 in turn B-D on lapack3; I then tried...
> - lapack3 in turn B-D on refblas3; I then tried... and failed because
>
> of:
> | gfortran -pipe -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -ff90 -fPIC -c src/c_abs.f -o
> | debian/shared/c_abs.o
> | f951: error: unrecognized command line option "-ff90"
> | make: *** [debian/shared/c_abs.o] Error 1
>
AFAIK, there is no -ff90 option in gfortran. It is specific to g77. Remove
that and also use -ffloat-store option if you want to compile refblas3
packages. I have had success compiling refblas3 packages with gfortran-4.2
using the -ffloat-store option.
I have missed the previous discussions. Is there any reason going with
gfortran-4.1 instead of gfortran-4.2?
raju
--
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/kk288/
http://malayamaarutham.blogspot.com/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Find out how you can get spam free email.
http://www.bluebottle.com/tag/3
Reply to: