[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#427257: marked as done (octave2.9: Missing -ff2c compiler flag causes wrong result on amd64)



Your message dated Thu, 07 Jun 2007 12:02:04 +0000
with message-id <E1HwGgm-0005PS-Vb@ries.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#427257: fixed in octave2.9 1:2.9.12-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: octave2.9
Severity: important

Dear Octave maintainers,

First I must apologize for reporting a bug I can't reproduce.  But if
this is a real bug, it's rather critical (I would have reported it as RC
if I could reproduce), and it may be architecture dependent, so here it
goes:

A user reported to Ubuntu that octave 2.9.9-6 (the source package is
unchanged, just rebuilt for Ubuntu) generates wrong results for complex
matrix multiplication [1].  The discussion on upstream mailing list [2]
confirmed that it's reproducible on Debian as well with 2.9.12 [3].
Both cases are on amd64 system.

1. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/octave2.9/+bug/117517
2. http://www.cae.wisc.edu/pipermail/bug-octave/2007-May/thread.html#2494
3. http://www.cae.wisc.edu/pipermail/bug-octave/2007-May/002498.html

The conclusion on upstream mailing list seems to be that Debian package
is missing the -ff2c flag when using gfortran to compile octave and
linking to g77-compiled BLAS/ATLAS libraries.

As I understand neither octave or Fortran ABI, I am just forwarding this
bug to Debian to raise your attention.  If a Debian maintainer can test
on an amd64 system, it will be greatly appreciated.

Ming
2007.06.02


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: octave2.9
Source-Version: 1:2.9.12-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
octave2.9, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

octave2.9-doc_2.9.12-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/octave2.9/octave2.9-doc_2.9.12-2_all.deb
octave2.9-emacsen_2.9.12-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/octave2.9/octave2.9-emacsen_2.9.12-2_all.deb
octave2.9-headers_2.9.12-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/octave2.9/octave2.9-headers_2.9.12-2_i386.deb
octave2.9-htmldoc_2.9.12-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/octave2.9/octave2.9-htmldoc_2.9.12-2_all.deb
octave2.9-info_2.9.12-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/octave2.9/octave2.9-info_2.9.12-2_all.deb
octave2.9_2.9.12-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/o/octave2.9/octave2.9_2.9.12-2.diff.gz
octave2.9_2.9.12-2.dsc
  to pool/main/o/octave2.9/octave2.9_2.9.12-2.dsc
octave2.9_2.9.12-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/octave2.9/octave2.9_2.9.12-2_i386.deb
octave_2.9.12-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/octave2.9/octave_2.9.12-2_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 427257@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Thomas Weber <thomas.weber.mail@gmail.com> (supplier of updated octave2.9 package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 07:48:32 +0000
Source: octave2.9
Binary: octave2.9-headers octave octave2.9-info octave2.9-htmldoc octave2.9 octave2.9-emacsen octave2.9-doc
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 1:2.9.12-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Octave Group <pkg-octave-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Thomas Weber <thomas.weber.mail@gmail.com>
Description: 
 octave     - GNU Octave language for numerical computations (2.9 branch)
 octave2.9  - GNU Octave language for numerical computations (2.9 branch)
 octave2.9-doc - PDF documentation on the GNU Octave language (2.9 branch)
 octave2.9-emacsen - Emacs support for the GNU Octave language (2.9 branch)
 octave2.9-headers - header files for the GNU Octave language (2.9 branch)
 octave2.9-htmldoc - HTML documentation on the GNU Octave language (2.9 branch)
 octave2.9-info - GNU Info documentation on the GNU Octave language (2.9 branch)
Closes: 427257
Changes: 
 octave2.9 (1:2.9.12-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * debian/in/control, debian/rules:
     + Switch back to g77 from gfortran (closes: #427257).
       This has been discussed with the toolchain guys and is the easist
       solution for now, see
       http://lists.debian.org/debian-gcc/2007/06/msg00024.html
     + Switch to SuiteSparse from UFSparse.
   * New patch:
     01_use_suitesparse_for_ufsparse.dpatch
     SuiteSparse introduced a new type in 3.0, see
     http://www.cae.wisc.edu/pipermail/help-octave/2007-June/004188.html
Files: 
 5be4ef560a08421be684398ccb464ab7 1354 math optional octave2.9_2.9.12-2.dsc
 783fe931ab449461bc79cba331ef9195 49494 math optional octave2.9_2.9.12-2.diff.gz
 7bbd702c02723a9def66149061fafa22 8039042 math optional octave2.9_2.9.12-2_i386.deb
 48d975a4ec760535c6afb4ee4edfe471 365034 math optional octave2.9-headers_2.9.12-2_i386.deb
 1935b0610a5b3af4b614233c699fe809 2496106 doc optional octave2.9-doc_2.9.12-2_all.deb
 6f98e5ef52fb7793d50dbe9ad55a4488 623046 math optional octave2.9-htmldoc_2.9.12-2_all.deb
 8b737e2522b3bb91bd7e1652d3e2e0b1 87010 math optional octave2.9-emacsen_2.9.12-2_all.deb
 6b2a49fb373b330d7ee8467726f3290e 436504 math optional octave2.9-info_2.9.12-2_all.deb
 3120bb235e26cb02a328c7e2fae68285 64258 math optional octave_2.9.12-2_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGZ6uLk3oga0pdcv4RAnriAJ0eXK2DGcwuzZOff0fz7XgnyK3qBgCfSjr9
CaXXg0JZ8UnhMWONGLDtORU=
=o73L
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--- End Message ---

Reply to: