Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 01.10.2014, 17:52 +0200 schrieb Stéphane Glondu: > Le 30/09/2014 15:14, Joachim Breitner a écrit : > > currently, > > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/haskell.html > > lists agda as bad on armel, armhf, hurd and others, although it is in > > state "uncompiled" according to wanna-build (and hence there is no > > transition problem). It would be nice if ben could be more accurate > > here. > > It says so because agda (the binary package) is arch:all, so its > installability is tested on all architectures. Are you suggesting that > we ignore also arch:all packages when the package is uncompiled? I think it would be the right guess in most cases, but possibly not all. > I'd > rather see a new predicate for this state, and an explicit reference to > it in good/bad queries. That’d work as well. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: F0FBF51F JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part