Re: Bug#701706: RFS: ocamlrss/2.0-1 [ITP] -- RSS 2.0 parser and printer for OCaml
Le 24/05/2013 10:09, Prach Pongpanich a écrit :
> Thanks for your review and suggestion, I have done all of the above.
Your Replaces/Breaks clause is always satisfied, even in oldstable...
isnt't? If so, it is pointless and you should remove it.
Does ocamlrss actually install files in the same location as cameleon?
Replaces/Breaks/Conflicts are there for expressing package-level
relationships, not for end users (in)convenience. IMHO, just installing
a module with the same name in different locations is not enough to
justify it.
I don't know exactly what you understood when I said:
> A period is missing at the end of the -dev description.
... but from your changes, it looks like it is not the lack of a
punctuation sign.
Cheers,
--
Stéphane
Reply to: