Bug#549840: marked as done (ocaml-speex: FTBFS: debian/rules:5: /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/ocaml.mk: No such file or directory)
Your message dated Wed, 14 Oct 2009 23:53:07 +0000
with message-id <E1MyDeV-0004lW-Ga@ries.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#549840: fixed in ocaml-speex 0.1.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #549840,
regarding ocaml-speex: FTBFS: debian/rules:5: /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/ocaml.mk: No such file or directory
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
549840: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=549840
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ocaml-speex
Version: 0.1.1-2
Severity: serious
User: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091005 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean
> debian/rules:5: /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/ocaml.mk: No such file or directory
> make: *** No rule to make target `/usr/share/cdbs/1/class/ocaml.mk'. Stop.
> dpkg-buildpackage: error: /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean gave error exit status 2
> ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
> Build finished at 20091005-1906
The full build log is available from:
http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2009/10/05/ocaml-speex_0.1.1-2_lsid64.buildlog
A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!
About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes
of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot. Internet was not
accessible from the build systems.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lucas@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ocaml-speex
Source-Version: 0.1.2-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ocaml-speex, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
libspeex-ocaml-dev_0.1.2-1_amd64.deb
to pool/main/o/ocaml-speex/libspeex-ocaml-dev_0.1.2-1_amd64.deb
libspeex-ocaml_0.1.2-1_amd64.deb
to pool/main/o/ocaml-speex/libspeex-ocaml_0.1.2-1_amd64.deb
ocaml-speex_0.1.2-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/o/ocaml-speex/ocaml-speex_0.1.2-1.diff.gz
ocaml-speex_0.1.2-1.dsc
to pool/main/o/ocaml-speex/ocaml-speex_0.1.2-1.dsc
ocaml-speex_0.1.2.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/o/ocaml-speex/ocaml-speex_0.1.2.orig.tar.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 549840@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Romain Beauxis <toots@rastageeks.org> (supplier of updated ocaml-speex package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:29:16 -0500
Source: ocaml-speex
Binary: libspeex-ocaml libspeex-ocaml-dev
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.1.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian OCaml Maintainers <debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Romain Beauxis <toots@rastageeks.org>
Description:
libspeex-ocaml - OCaml interface to the speex library
libspeex-ocaml-dev - OCaml interface to the speex library
Closes: 549840
Changes:
ocaml-speex (0.1.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
[ Stephane Glondu ]
* Use ocaml.mk as a CDBS "rules" file (Closes: #549840)
.
[ Romain Beauxis ]
* New upstream release.
* Bumped standards version to 3.8.3
* Enabled debugging.
* Use new dependency system.
* Added doc-base registration.
Checksums-Sha1:
c20c8e7885c165bd8a28a42798d0984c3bc674e0 1725 ocaml-speex_0.1.2-1.dsc
b11141ffd166420b1884b74aee92c36faaffc587 70290 ocaml-speex_0.1.2.orig.tar.gz
3e322956b7de17d599998056212c41e6ffd93845 2350 ocaml-speex_0.1.2-1.diff.gz
a1ec1147a18bd9b874f3e5b5d38e8d9960e48f21 11896 libspeex-ocaml_0.1.2-1_amd64.deb
e884d85bd2d86987af6831df7d50ef735ede6942 62344 libspeex-ocaml-dev_0.1.2-1_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
ce06653438fbb55bd653492ccbc4ee5eccd2aa79afb07f29ec3885b9d03835ed 1725 ocaml-speex_0.1.2-1.dsc
72b522880628a579910538b3cbe1f8a4ee9307d932c6603a993501d0b73b724a 70290 ocaml-speex_0.1.2.orig.tar.gz
2191a6e582795c5c5aa9a4f37a412a84c7823851f3e1f805d3ce372eea132bc2 2350 ocaml-speex_0.1.2-1.diff.gz
cecb9835997744ebac114f0fbb09fe42f0a6671c257f6d0ac06965174debd597 11896 libspeex-ocaml_0.1.2-1_amd64.deb
258fb5428cef8808c0551fa937284e15eabee124bb142b6fdc83c106ebf9fd13 62344 libspeex-ocaml-dev_0.1.2-1_amd64.deb
Files:
8f948e9f0241497be812211764a5b7fa 1725 ocaml optional ocaml-speex_0.1.2-1.dsc
6df05fbce350b1bd8d9e6cea8a0e9345 70290 ocaml optional ocaml-speex_0.1.2.orig.tar.gz
152e917bb8b0fcafee58e1a9d94da001 2350 ocaml optional ocaml-speex_0.1.2-1.diff.gz
46b54a840beedb5c05ffdb50e80e19c7 11896 ocaml optional libspeex-ocaml_0.1.2-1_amd64.deb
9a004aa8b3749d2a987af557da960c60 62344 ocaml optional libspeex-ocaml-dev_0.1.2-1_amd64.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJK1lLgAAoJEAC5aaocqV0ZhjMIAJ2fNOQs47GJz46hd3cM8O0d
DC4M8dnSVmsxDzb5cxeJkPVMgdk8pTowIk6FmFu0DZdZT7ObZ5z3diJ/JTFcNzEn
3vstvSycDml8Bm/inIaSkOsTFija/IH4BsJ1EUlZX4fbufupGsXaUE1B1rx8sPhv
HPZNuWYogP2VRuCWtc7uo+7r5g1ztAxprGnrL7A2JxcbgJtVOA9r9DJ408ERZfBT
V6Cl2L99BBZvbVInWBNJhOxWZGIFickspYwjUvzpRQFYNOAoGIDLpcTpPm/r8nuL
JWSBJl954/iNg9GryPG7RzDqlWnYhVF73XRl6xa/+t36CYyqSZNBMJLqWeth4Bw=
=y573
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
Reply to: