Re: [Fwd: [Pkg-ocaml-maint-commits] [SCM] libfuse-ocaml packaging branch, debian, updated. debian/0.2-1-1-g0b81018]
Mehdi Dogguy <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Is this really necessary?
> debian/changelog should only talk about packaging changes and not upstream
> ones (ok maybe one sentence if there is an important change).
> Changes related to upstream should be present in upstream's changelog
> installed in /usr/share/doc/
> Am I mistaken?
If it weren't for the Pkg-ocaml-maint policy that all packages are to
be debian packages this would be a native package. It is bad enough
the source is split between 2 git repositories. I'm not going to split
changelogs as well. Otherwise the debian changelog would only say "new
upstream version" on verry nearly every release.