[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Policy, location of .cma files in binary packages, and dynlink...



On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 09:19:38AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On the bright side, your spit will not mess up dependencies since -dev
> packages will still need to dep on other -dev packages and on their non
> -dev package so we can even think to do the move of *.cma piecewise.

Actually, on a second thought, the above is true, but the move is non
invasive only for packages which were already split between -dev and
runtime. For pure OCaml library (e.g. pxp) the split was not in place
and has to be introduced if we want to move *.cma elsewhere.

Cheers.

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ............... now what?
zack@{upsilon.cc,cs.unibo.it,debian.org}  -<%>-  http://upsilon.cc/zack/
(15:56:48)  Zack: e la demo dema ?    /\    All one has to do is hit the
(15:57:15)  Bac: no, la demo scema    \/    right keys at the right time

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: