Re: ocaml_3.10.0-10_i386.changes ACCEPTED
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 01:48:03PM +0000, Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
> On 19-12-2007, Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 11:02:04AM +0000, Debian Installer wrote:
> >> Accepted:
> >
> > This was annoying.
> >
> > I've (thought I had) fixed the bug, since I did svn-buildpackage and
> > then checked that the script was executable in the resulting .deb. It
> > was since the build was made starting from an "svn export" which
> > preservers the executable bit.
> >
> > Then I've rebuild the official package for the upload using cowbuilder,
> > assuming everything was fine. It was not, since cowbuilder starts from
> > the .dsc + .diff.gz which do not preserve the executable bit.
> >
> > That's why I'm going from a second upload, with now an explicit chmod +x
> > inside debian/control.
> >
> >
> > /me hates the tiny teeny differences among
> > our build tools and now wonders why the hell
> > svn-buildpackage starts from a svn export if
> > that can cause unexpected build differences.
>
> /me Understanding Zack which has been hit by the same bug as the first I
> fell into
>
> Maybe we can fill a bug concerning this problem against
> svn-builbpackage...
yes, I think that merits a bug against svn-buildpackage.
-Ralf.
Reply to: