Re: ocaml_3.10.0-10_i386.changes ACCEPTED
On 19-12-2007, Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 11:02:04AM +0000, Debian Installer wrote:
>> Accepted:
>
> This was annoying.
>
> I've (thought I had) fixed the bug, since I did svn-buildpackage and
> then checked that the script was executable in the resulting .deb. It
> was since the build was made starting from an "svn export" which
> preservers the executable bit.
>
> Then I've rebuild the official package for the upload using cowbuilder,
> assuming everything was fine. It was not, since cowbuilder starts from
> the .dsc + .diff.gz which do not preserve the executable bit.
>
> That's why I'm going from a second upload, with now an explicit chmod +x
> inside debian/control.
>
>
> /me hates the tiny teeny differences among
> our build tools and now wonders why the hell
> svn-buildpackage starts from a svn export if
> that can cause unexpected build differences.
/me Understanding Zack which has been hit by the same bug as the first I
fell into
Maybe we can fill a bug concerning this problem against
svn-builbpackage...
Regards,
Sylvain Le Gall
Reply to: