Re: ara 1.0.18
On 17-08-2007, George Danchev <danchev@spnet.net> wrote:
> On Thursday 16 August 2007, Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
>> On 16-08-2007, George Danchev <danchev@spnet.net> wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > ara 1.0.18 [1] is ready for upload. It fixes a minor wishlist bug. I'd be
>> > glad if someone upload it for me. Thanks.
>> >
>> > [1] svn.debian.org/svn/ara
>> > --
>> > pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18 <people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu>
>> > fingerprint 1AE7 7C66 0A26 5BFF DF22 5D55 1C57 0C89 0E4B D0AB
>>
>> I have still a bunch of warning :
>> W: ara source: debian-rules-ignores-make-clean-error line 59
>> W: xara-gtk-byte: menu-item-uses-apps-section
>> /usr/share/menu/xara-gtk-byte:6
>> W: xara-gtk-byte: menu-item-creates-new-section Apps/Tools
>> /usr/share/menu/xara-gtk-byte:6
>> W: xara-gtk: menu-item-uses-apps-section /usr/share/menu/xara-gtk:6
>> W: xara-gtk: menu-item-creates-new-section Apps/Tools
>> /usr/share/menu/xara-gtk:6
>>
>> Could you correct it ? I will upload ara after this.
>
> Sylvain, thanks for pointing these out!
>
> Fixed are now: trunk/ and tags/1.0.18/. Lintian is happy since it is aware of
> the new menu structure [1], but I believe that linda is not aware of that and
> still produces warnigns like:
>
I will have a look at it tonight (now i am at work, i cannot upload
things).
> W: xara-gtk; The menu file has section Applications, which is unknown.
> The menu file contains the section shown above, which is unknown. The
> current list is taken from Debian Menu Policy.
> W: xara-gtk-byte; The menu file has section Applications, which is unknown.
>
>
> This is bug #434989 filed against linda a while ago.
>
> [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2007/07/msg00000.html
>
OK.
Please consider, letting me do the "tag" when i upload things (don't know
if it is a better way, but at least, your package will have been
reviewed by uploaders...). Moreover tagging is integrated in
svn-buildpackage... (but you can let the tag you created, i can cope
with this).
Kind regard
Sylvain Le Gall
Reply to: