[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Depends clause of control



On Sat, 2006-08-26 at 21:59 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:

> Sure, then you are in the advi example, not the spamoracle one, and -custom is
> indeed preferable. I think the policy mentions something of this kind.
> 
> Now, the idea thing is to move the c++ bindings in their own binary package,
> and you fall again in the spamoracle example.

Yes I agree. However, properly this would require about
20-30 separate packages. And that requires documenting
and testing each component, as well as the Debian
packaging scripts.

I have enough trouble getting just ONE package
to work :)

-- 
John Skaller <skaller at users dot sf dot net>
Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net



Reply to: