Re: Depends clause of control
On Sat, 2006-08-26 at 21:59 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Sure, then you are in the advi example, not the spamoracle one, and -custom is
> indeed preferable. I think the policy mentions something of this kind.
> Now, the idea thing is to move the c++ bindings in their own binary package,
> and you fall again in the spamoracle example.
Yes I agree. However, properly this would require about
20-30 separate packages. And that requires documenting
and testing each component, as well as the Debian
I have enough trouble getting just ONE package
to work :)
John Skaller <skaller at users dot sf dot net>
Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net