Re: Depends clause of control
On Sat, 2006-08-26 at 20:37 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 03:24:05AM +1000, skaller wrote:
> > Each kind of portability -- insensitive to ABI or
> > insensitive to CPU -- is useful. Whilst Ocaml
> > continues to provide a new ABI each patch,
> > there should be a choice .. IMHO.
> This is not what is prefered for debian package, since using -custom means
> that you cannot reuse the same bytecode binaries on different arches, and thus
> end with a lot of identic and duplicate packages in debian,
There's no way to reuse the bytecode in my package anyhow.
The package also contains arch dependent binaries
(compiled C++ code).
John Skaller <skaller at users dot sf dot net>
Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net