Re: libcamlrun.so

[Jérôme Marant <jmarant@free.fr>]

> Well, I'm hoping that the necessary patches will go into upstream
> which makes the point moot.  However, I don't understand your point
> that having libcamlrun.so is somehow more "messy" than having
> libcamlrun.a.  In both cases there will be programs depending on the
> exact same API.  libcamlrun is the bytecode interpreter, and is fully
> documented in the official manual.  It's not some sort of "internals".

My sincere apologies. I misunderstood the problem at first
glance. After reading the bug report, it's definitely going to be
useful (I just switched to AMD64 myself).

Thanks.

-- 
Jérôme Marant