On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 05:13:21PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> Well, i was wrong, obviously, there is only one, altough it is of two
> different kinds.
Ok.
> If we move debian/control to debian/control.in, we can then use the same
> substitution for a debian/control target in the rules file. Let me adapt
> lablgl to this scheme and so you can compare.
I prefere the solution without debian/control.in, is a complication
which does not add much benefit IMO.
> I hear that there is discussin for moving the libraries to the abi
> scheme also, which would be reather neat.
I don't know what you heard, but Julien contacted me about dh_ocaml and
a proposal for having more fine grained library dependencies and we
discussed a way of automatic computation of ABI numbers from md5sums. He
is preparing a draft proposal which will be posted soon on d-o-m for
comments. In that proposal your idea of substitution can probably be
integrated from depending libraries. More on this soon.
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- Computer Science PhD student @ Uny Bologna, Italy
zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/
If there's any real truth it's that the entire multidimensional infinity
of the Universe is almost certainly being run by a bunch of maniacs. -!-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature