On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 02:44:02PM -0400, Mike Furr wrote:
> Oops, missed the CC to -release
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: ocaml-3.08.3 transition almost ready
> Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 13:41:40 -0500 (CDT)
> Resent-From: debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org
> Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 14:26:02 -0400
> From: Mike Furr <mfurr@debian.org>
> To: debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org
> References: <[🔎] 20050412181125.GG12429@bryan.is-a-geek.org>
> Julien Cristau wrote:
> >numerix (0.19-4 to 0.19-5.1.1)
> >ocamlcreal (0.4-4 to 0.4-5)
> >I don't quite understand these. (incorrect binNMU version numbers,
> >perhaps?)
> yeah, I totally botched the numerix upload. I meant to just upload the
> -i386 .deb (via the version -5.1.1), but forgot the -B to
> dpkg-buildpackage, so it got treated as a regular upload. :-(
> ocamlcreal should be correct though. I'm not sure why the testing
> scripts think its out of date...
ocamlcreal (0.4-4 to 0.4-5)
Maintainer: Mike Furr
18 days old (needed 5 days)
out of date on i386: libcreal-ocaml-dev (from 0.4-5.1.1)
Not considered
Depends: ocamlcreal ocaml
Depends: ocamlcreal mlgmp
Because this is not the correct version numbering for a recompile-only
binNMU. It seems to have been accepted as such by katie, but should not
have been; and is now being rejected by britney. You'll have to do a full
sourceful upload to fix this.
See the developer's reference for proper binary-only NMU versioning.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature