Bug#307919: marked as done (advi: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on groff-base)
Your message dated Fri, 06 May 2005 15:47:08 -0400
with message-id <E1DU8my-0007CK-00@newraff.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#307919: fixed in advi 1.6.0-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 May 2005 13:19:19 +0000
>From aj@andaco.de Fri May 06 06:19:19 2005
Return-path: <aj@andaco.de>
Received: from c174134.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.174.134]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DU2je-0007nP-00; Fri, 06 May 2005 06:19:18 -0700
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DU2jX-0002rn-Aq; Fri, 06 May 2005 15:19:11 +0200
Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 15:19:11 +0200
To: Debian-OCaml-Liste <debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org>
Cc: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: advi: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on groff-base
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20050506131911.GA1575@andaco.de>
References: <[🔎] 20050506123245.GA2929@itp.uni-hannover.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20050506123245.GA2929@itp.uni-hannover.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
From: Andreas Jochens <aj@andaco.de>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
NEW_DOMAIN_EXTENSIONS autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: advi
Version: 1.6.0-5
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hello Helge,
On 05-May-06 14:32, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> Hello Andreas,
> I saw by chance your list in
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-amd64/2005/05/msg00166.html
>
> There you state:
> advi - + missing Build-Depends on groff-base
>
> To check this, I just rebuild advi on my amd64-machine (running Sarge)
> *without* groff-base installed, and it build fine. Please do *not* remove
> advi from Sarge and if there is a FTBS, then *please* file a proper
> bug report so that I can fix it (or someone of the OCAML-Team/some
> NMUler).
I apologize for not having filed a proper bug report for this
problem earlier.
I just rechecked this. When trying to build advi in a clean chroot
environment on amd64/sarge and also on i386/sarge, I get the following:
(/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/hyperref/pdfmark.def))
! LaTeX Error: File `advi.sty' not found.
Type X to quit or <RETURN> to proceed,
or enter new name. (Default extension: sty)
Enter file name:
and then the build stops and waits for input. With an additional
Build-Depends on groff-base, the package builds fine.
Despite the fact that you said you can build the package without
groff-base, I file this as 'serious', because I can reproduce
this on i386 with the following simple commands:
su
apt-get remove groff-base
apt-get source advi
cd advi-1.6.0
dpkg-buildpackage
I hope that I did not miss anything.
Regards
Andreas Jochens
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/advi-1.6.0/debian/control ./debian/control
--- ../tmp-orig/advi-1.6.0/debian/control 2005-04-29 20:13:09.834629142 +0200
+++ ./debian/control 2005-04-29 20:13:02.436753790 +0200
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Debian OCaml Maintainers <debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org>
Uploaders: Ralf Treinen <treinen@debian.org>, Sven Luther <luther@debian.org>, Jerome Marant <jerome@debian.org>, Remi Vanicat <vanicat@debian.org>, Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org>, Sylvain Le Gall <sylvain.le-gall@polytechnique.org>, Michael K. Edwards (in Debian context) <mkedeb@sane.net>
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4.0.0), tetex-bin, ocaml-3.08.3, libncurses5-dev, xlibs-dev, libcamlimages-ocaml-dev (>= 2.20-1), tetex-extra, zlib1g-dev, gs, dpatch, chrpath, ocaml-best-compilers, hevea
+Build-Depends: debhelper, groff-base, tetex-bin, ocaml-3.08.3, libncurses5-dev, xlibs-dev, libcamlimages-ocaml-dev (>= 2.20-1), tetex-extra, zlib1g-dev, gs, dpatch, chrpath, ocaml-best-compilers, hevea
Standards-Version: 3.6.1
Package: advi
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 307919-close) by bugs.debian.org; 6 May 2005 19:53:23 +0000
>From katie@ftp-master.debian.org Fri May 06 12:53:23 2005
Return-path: <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DU8t1-0002Im-00; Fri, 06 May 2005 12:53:23 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DU8my-0007CK-00; Fri, 06 May 2005 15:47:08 -0400
From: Ralf Treinen <treinen@debian.org>
To: 307919-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#307919: fixed in advi 1.6.0-6
Message-Id: <E1DU8my-0007CK-00@newraff.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Date: Fri, 06 May 2005 15:47:08 -0400
Delivered-To: 307919-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
Source: advi
Source-Version: 1.6.0-6
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
advi, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
advi-examples_1.6.0-6_all.deb
to pool/main/a/advi/advi-examples_1.6.0-6_all.deb
advi_1.6.0-6.diff.gz
to pool/main/a/advi/advi_1.6.0-6.diff.gz
advi_1.6.0-6.dsc
to pool/main/a/advi/advi_1.6.0-6.dsc
advi_1.6.0-6_i386.deb
to pool/main/a/advi/advi_1.6.0-6_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 307919@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Ralf Treinen <treinen@debian.org> (supplier of updated advi package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 20:51:05 +0200
Source: advi
Binary: advi advi-examples
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1.6.0-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Debian OCaml Maintainers <debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Ralf Treinen <treinen@debian.org>
Description:
advi - an active DVI previewer and presenter
advi-examples - example presentations for Active-DVI (advi)
Closes: 286454 307919
Changes:
advi (1.6.0-6) unstable; urgency=high
.
* Patch examples-makefiles-texinputs: fix TEXINPUTS variable in various
Makefiles in examples/ such advi styles are found even when the advi
package is not installed. Fixes FTBFS. (Closes: #307919).
* Fixed some typos in description, rephrased short and long descriptions a
bit (closes: #286454).
Files:
960cfb083ae8a1e059d4aae8bb38df43 1058 tex optional advi_1.6.0-6.dsc
4831e62550db8e768b7b3d00149f4d66 24024 tex optional advi_1.6.0-6.diff.gz
cdb19fd816c12ba8993b59dc82455b26 4356868 tex optional advi-examples_1.6.0-6_all.deb
00251451b7d8f2453e193e308152ddd6 549342 tex optional advi_1.6.0-6_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCe7+RtzWmSeC6BMERAvsVAJ9gLfBpsKVddIN0UXa8tPuZgGoMnwCg6+gN
ZuXQL/bH/p8RAC5pVGy+L3M=
=8WeZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: