Re: Summary : ocaml, QPL and the DFSG.
On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 04:08:00AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 07:38:38PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Alternatively, a clean recapitulation of all this would be a good thing right
> > now maybe.
>
> Quite possibly. I think that starting a clean thread for each problematic
> clause should work, with an admonishment not to bring unrelated matters into
> each relevant thread, to keep it clean.
Ok, will do that in the morning.
> > Maybe it would be best that you don't try refuting all my points, but
> > present your own interpretation from the start to the end ?
>
> OK, but what happens then? We're not exactly in front of a judge and jury
> here -- there's no arbitrator to say whose interpretation is the most
> persuasive...
Well, i think that it would be easier than futile back and fort
counter-arguing, which are sterile in the end.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: