Re: SVN repository reorganized
On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 04:26:20PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 03:07:08PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > Anyway as said I've no problem with this layout: fell free to go ahead
> > and reorganize the repository in this way.
>
> I've reorganized the repository as suggested:
>
> pkg-ocaml-maint/
> |-- packages
> | `-- camlidl
> | `-- trunk
> | |-- camlidl_1.04.orig.tar.gz
> | `-- debian
> | |-- camlidl.1
> | |-- camlidl.examples
> | |-- camlidl.manpages
> | |-- changelog
> | |-- compat
> | |-- control
> | |-- copyright
> | |-- dirs
> | |-- docs
> | |-- patches
> | | |-- 00list
> | | `-- 37_make.dpatch
> | |-- rules
> | `-- watch
> `-- policy
> `-- trunk
>
> So now we have two projects ("packages" and "policy"), packages contains
> one subproject for each package with an inner "trunk" directory and,
> possibly, one inner "branches" directory.
>
> Two questions for Sven:
> 1) is ok to you to move the policy on SVN? It was one of the original
> proposal for SVN (and we used it asking for the repository :-)
Please go ahead, use the policy package from
http://people.debian.org/~luther/ocaml/ocaml_packaging_policy though, or
the one from my 3.06-17 package.
> 2) I remember from a previous thread that you would like to move the
> ocaml package on SVN, right?
Yep, but i have not had the time to read-up on SVN, nor will i have in
the next time. If you could be so kind as to put the 3.06-16 source
package into SVN, i would then check in my 3.06-16 modifications.
Now, i see from the diagram above that you only wanted to put the debian
directory into SVN, and that you finally also moved the orig tarball.
Would it not make better sense for ocaml to contain the whole unpacked
tree ? And in this case to have a upstream and a trunk directory ?
But then, again, i know nothing about subversion.
BTW, How did you adapt to Paris ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: