Re: patch - add an ocaml-interp binary package
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 08:06:12PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 10:54:56AM -0800, David Fox wrote:
> > Sven Luther wrote:
> > >That said, i could make a ocaml-interpreter package, which would be
> > >provided, replaced and conflicted by the ocaml package. What do you
> > >think of that ?
> > >
> > >
> > I was thinking that since the ocaml-interpreter is all files that are
> > currently part of the ocaml package, you could make ocaml depend on
> > ocaml-interpreter and make ocaml-interpreter depend on ocaml-base.
> Yep, i understand, but ocaml-interpreter is part of the ocaml package.
> So either you get the true thing (ocaml) or only the interpreter.
But when you split the ocaml package as David suggested and put the
interpreter in a separate package and remove it from the ocaml
package. Why wouldn't that work? As we did before when creating
the ocaml-base package?