[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [xavier.leroy@inria.fr: Re: [Caml-list] Copyright Clarifications]

On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 11:35:53AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> You don't need to split it: just remove it entirely and add a comment
> in README.Debian.

Calm down :)

Yes, you're right, we can't ship ocaml as it is right now. OTOH BigNum
is really an important library and IMO we should do our best to ship it
in non-free (assuming here there's no free-software Taleban :).

The right thing(TM) to do seems to split two new libbignum-ocaml{,-dev}
packages. Who is going to do it? Sven?


Stefano Zacchiroli  --  Master in Computer Science @ Uni. Bologna, Italy
zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it}  -  http://www.bononia.it/zack/
"  I know you believe you understood what you think I said, but I am not
sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant!  " -- G.Romney

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: