On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 07:20:47PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > Also this may cause problems with Stefano's plan for library depends. Well, the library dependencies aren't really a problem, there we can safely fall back on 'standard' versiones build dependencies (e.g. Build-Depends: libxxx-ocaml-dev (>= 1.2.3), libxxx-ocaml-dev (<< 1.2.4)) that is ugly but works. I proposed the virtual package solution for 'consistency' with the ocaml package solution. Returning to the 'ocaml' package issue, what does we 'risk' falling back to versioned build dependencies? Can something be broken by this falling back? Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli - Undergraduate Student of CS @ Uni. Bologna, Italy zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} - http://www.bononia.it/zack/ "I know you believe you understood what you think I said, but I am not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant!" -- G.Romney
Attachment:
pgpO9fh1hJ4Vj.pgp
Description: PGP signature