Re: Shall we state on naming (again)?
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 05:43:52PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> BTW, please don't forget to use correct dependencies with every ocaml
> package that use bytecode code, even if it is standalone code, it should
> depend on ocaml-base-3.06, not some other strange stuff. Especially all
> older (well those in woody at least) such package that do not have both
> the ocaml-base (>= 3.04) and ocaml-base (<< 3.05) dependencies are
> _BROKEN_. But then they are in woody, nothing much we can do on this.
Should we really always restrict dependency to one particular
upstream version of ocaml? That would be safest, I agree. On the
other hand it will prevent a new upstream version of ocaml to go
into testing unless all packages compiled into bytecode are
ready to go with it.
-Ralf.
Reply to: