Re: ocamlodbc packaging
On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 02:51:08PM +0200, Georges Mariano wrote:
> Sven LUTHER wrote:
> .. ocaml-web ... nice.
No! ocamlweb is the upstream name, and hence is the name of the package.
> > Anyway, i think we should conform to the ocaml-xxx naming scheme for new
> > libraries and bindings, letting standalone programs keep their upstream name
> Yes !!
Can anyone give me good reason why we should name all ocaml packages
in uniform way? This is just weird.