[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Debian-NP logo



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Calen Kennedy wrote:
|
|  > Salute,
|  >
|  > Well I just had a look at Calen's designs and they're great - using
both
|  > the debian logo and tux all in one - which definitely links NP (in the
|  > public's mind)
|  > to Debian and Linux in no uncertain terms. We have to then think
whether
|  > this is
|  > our primary objective (using popular symbols to gain interest and
support
|  > for NP)
|  > or whether we want to create a logo that symbolizes NP's spirit and the
|  > Open Source
|  > philosophy through something unique.
|
| I think this depends on weather the OS is going to be Debian with a
few mods
| and NP software(in witch case I would create a new logo with the old
debian
| logo in it someware, and maybe tux too :-) or more of a whole new
linux (in
| witch case I would create a hole new logo, with out any old linux logos)

Well if it is Debian Non-Profit, I would have to assume it is a Debian
System.  Therefore, I think out of respect to Debian it should have one
of the Debian logos somewhere in it.

However,  Debian does (or will not) depend solely on the Linux kernel.
You could feasibly use the HURD or BSD kernel instead (or so there
appears to be such efforts)  Because of this I would avoid using the
Penguin in the logo.

On a different subject, I am one of the upstream maintainers of GNU
Enterprise (http://www.gnuenterprise.org).  I am looking to make some
stuff specialised for non-profit, likely to include "donor management"
and "fund accounting modules". There will like be some membership
management stuff as well.

I would like to work with Debian NP in this effort.

- -Derek Neighbors
Finally not just lurking. :)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/XWTbHb99+vQX/88RAltSAJ4sN1Em7EsaTfj6KSbdlCcNiI1gWgCgl5KL
fflSYKl5eM4Yslu9VDHtKXc=
=iGJp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: