discrepancy about Innocent de Marchi's key
Hi!
In your NM support statement, you said:
> I hereby endorse the application of Innocent De Marchi,
> <tangram.peces@gmail.com>, key id = 5D0701391B3F2179490DACC50EAF53D71D019F05,
However, the key on the NM process is
539AE45A8B8F78EB22523E7F86338E22F1A65643, which is the only key with human
signatures (including mine, from Vaumarcus).
On the other hand, it looks like there's an intent to use 5D..05:
pub rsa4096 2010-11-01 [SC]
539AE45A8B8F78EB22523E7F86338E22F1A65643
uid [ full ] Innocent De Marchi (Clau personal) <innocent.demarchi@gmail.com>
uid [ full ] Innocent De Marchi (UID de treball) <tangram.peces@gmail.com>
(many sigs)
pub dsa1024 2009-11-26 [SCA]
5D0701391B3F2179490DACC50EAF53D71D019F05
uid [ unknown] Innocent De Marchi (Clau peces Debian) <tangram.peces@gmail.com>
which, being 1024 bit, is no good.
Meow!
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ Imagine there are bandits in your house, your kid is bleeding out,
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ the house is on fire, and seven big-ass trumpets are playing in the
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ sky. Your cat demands food. The priority should be obvious...
Reply to: