[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: DM application of Christian Seiler

Christian started working with me on the open-iscsi package, more than
a year ago. Having been doing it alone for some time, it was good to
have a helping hand. In Christian, I could quickly find a co-
maintainer, I was looking for.

With him, he brings in good insight into not just the tools, but also
the supporting infrastructure. SAN (Storage) is one area where you need
a lot of tools working closely together. Christian has helped revive
the open-iscsi package into a much better state, fixed lots of old
bugs, worked on integrating the new systemd support into iscsi (and
other tools) and many more I can't recollect.

Hence, I believe that Christian Seiler has the technical skills needed
to maintain Debian packages. I support his application to become a
Debian maintainer.


On Sun, 2016-02-07 at 12:33 +0100, Christian Seiler wrote:
> Hi,
> This is my declaration of intent to become a Debian Maintainer
> <https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMaintainer>.
> I have read the Social Contract, Debian Free Software Guidelines and
> Debian Machine Usage Policy and agree with all of them.
> Currently, I maintain the package tiny-initramfs and I co‐maintain
> the package open-iscsi.
> My GnuPG key 0x55DB1ABC3818B08C is signed by 14 Debian Developers:
>  - Ritesh Raj Sarraf (rrs)
>  - Aaron M. Ucko (ucko)
>  - Magnus Holmgren (holmgren)
>  - Timo Weingärtner (tiwe)
>  - Michael Prokop (mika)
>  - Stefan Fritsch (sf)
>  - Philipp Matthias Hahn (pmhahn)
>  - Michael Biebl (biebl)
>  - Eugene Žukov (eugene)
>  - Lev Lamberov (dogsleg)
>  - Rhonda D'Vine (rhonda)
>  - Eduard Bloch (blade)
>  - Daniel Kahn Gillmor (dkg)
>  - Philip Hands (philh)
> I look forward to becoming a Debian Maintainer. Thanks for your
> attention.
> Best regards,
> Christian
Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs
Debian - The Universal Operating System

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: