Re: DM application of Nigel Kukard
Hi Scott,
> According to https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/postfix-policyd postfix-policyd is
> only in oldstable and Nigel is not listed as a maintainer, so I'm confused
> about what Nigel is maintaining.
Nigel is postfix-policyd's upstream, as for all packages which he mentioned
below but do not show up on
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=nkukard@lbsd.net
Hope that makes it clearer.
(Please keep him CC, Nigel is not subscribed to debian-newmaint)
--
tobi
> Scott K
>
> On Saturday, November 22, 2014 20:19:32 Eriberto Mota wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I recommend Nigel Kukard to become a Debian Maintainer.
>>
>> I was sponsor of some packages made by Nigel. He has an excellent skill
>> about packaging and he always try to do a perfect work.
>>
>> Nigel has a very good knowledge about FOSS and he already worked in past
>> maintaining several (hundreds) packages in IDMS Linux, a distro based in
>> RedHat.
>>
>> Nigel has full conditions to maintain packages and I think that he will be a
>> very important contributor for Debian.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Eriberto
>>
>> 2014-11-22 9:07 GMT-02:00 Nigel Kukard <nkukard@lbsd.net>:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > This is my declaration of intent to become a Debian Maintainer
>> > <URL:http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMaintainer>.
>> >
>> > I have read the Social Contract, Debian Free Software Guidelines and
>> > Debian Machine Usage Policy and agree with all of them.
>> >
>> > Currently, I am the upstream developer and maintainer of the
>> > packages awit-dbackup, cputool, ppp-gatekeeper, postfix-policyd. I
>> > am also maintainer of sql-ledger (adopted). ref [1].
>> >
>> > My GnuPG key 0x1CA9D02E is signed by the Debian Developer Stefano
>> > Rivera with key 0xCD92D072. I look forward to becoming a Debian
>> > Maintainer and being a valuable member of the Debian community.
>> >
>> > Thanks for your attention.
>> >
>> > (I'm not subscribed to this list, so please CC me. Thanks!)
>> >
>> > 1: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=nkukard@lbsd.net
>> >
>> > Regards
>> > Nigel Kukard
>
Reply to: