[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Re: DM application of Philip Rinn



package debian-maintainers
tags 734780 + moreinfo
close

On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 08:36:59PM +1100, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 04:21:59PM +0100, "Steffen Möller" wrote:
>>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 08. Januar 2014 um 22:23 Uhr
>>> Von: "Piotr Ozarowski" <ozarow@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> I sponsor subtitleeditor package (Philip took it over in 2010) and
>>> I will not have any doubts to give him upload permissions for it.
>> 
>> I just sponsored r-cran-scatterplot3d for Phil and the only bit that
>> annoyed me was that he was not a DM already, so I reminded him :o)
> 
> Hello Steffen and Piotr,
> 
> Two-lines advocacies!
> 
> Please consider sending a more extensive/detailed advocacy message.
> 
> And Steffen's advocacy isn't signed.
> 
> At
> https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMaintainer#Advocating_a_Debian_Maintainer
> it reads:
> 
>  A Debian Developer should only advocate a Debian Maintainer candidate
>  if they are familiar with the candidate's existing work in Debian and
>  believe it to be of a suitable standard both technically and socially.
> 
>  Debian Developers advocating Debian Maintainer candidates (or potential
>  Debian Developers for that matter) must go into a bit more detail in
>  their advocacy.
> 
>  If the Debian Maintainer candidate has done "a great job", please
>  explain what "a great job" means -- is there something special the
>  candidate has done, or is it that whatever the candidate is working on
>  is particularly important, or is the candidate remarkably consistent, or
>  what?
> 
>  What has the candidate actually done that has earned your trust? What
>  makes the candidate special compared to the other folks who are helping
>  Debian? What in particular about the candidate's work should people
>  lurking on the Debian lists be trying to emulate if they want to be a
>  Debian Maintainer or a Debian Developer?
> 
>  For example, if the Debian Maintainer candidate has good packaging
>  skills, go into a bit more detail about what's convinced you the
>  candidate has got those skills? Are there any difficult bugs you've
>  worked together on, or new features the candidate has done a good job of
>  getting into Debian, or has the candidate been particularly helpful
>  supporting users, or...? 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Aníbal

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: