on Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 14:43:28 +0800, zigo wrote: > PS: Done again using the gpg command line, since enigmail + icedove > doesn't seem to work. on Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 14:03:27 +0800 > I'm hereby advocating for Prach. Doing it again since there was a problem > with my signature on the previous message. On 05/21/2013 02:47 AM, zigo@debian.org wrote: > See attachement for a signed version of my advocacy. > This is getting quite annoying. I hope Enigmail and > Icedove can be fixed... Hi, i'm helping to maintain enigmail in debian, and i noticed your complaint. I'm unable to reproduce the problem myself, though. Is the problem you're seeing related to a specific bug report that i can try to fix? If not, could you tell me specifically how to reproduce it? If you want to tell me by opening a bug report, that would be great! alternately, i'm happy to open the bug report for you. Regards, --dkg PS your headers suggest that you are using, please let me know if that's not the case: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.12) Gecko/20130116 Icedove/10.0.12 X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature