On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 12:45:11PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On 04/22/2009 08:36 AM, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote: > > Let's test if its a version 4 or greater key > > Key is ok > > Check for key expire stuff > > Key has an expiration date of 2009-06-19 > > 2012-05-31. > > Just a note on the weird-looking key expiration here: my primary key > expires in 2012. The only bit that expires in june is my smaller > authentication-capable subkey: > > 0 dkg@pip:~$ gpg --with-colons --list-key 0xd21739e9 | cut -d: -f > 1,3,7,12 | grep '^[ps]ub' > pub:4096:2012-05-31:scESCA > sub:4096:2012-05-31:e > sub:2048:2009-06-19:a > 0 dkg@pip:~$ > > I suspect that the scripts used to generate these reports aren't used to > dealing with keys with different expiration dates. Since the debian > project probably currently only cares about OpenPGP usage for signing This isn't correct; the initial account password is sent out encrypted to the key so it has to have a valid encryption part. J. -- Can I drink your juice?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature