On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 11:53:50AM +0100, Jan Wagner wrote: > Hi there, > > On Tuesday 27 November 2007 10:30, Loïc Minier wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2007, Enrico Zini wrote: > > > [note: considering that this list is public and googlable, I don't feel > > > comfortable in expressing negative judgements in it. Could a > > > non-publicly-archived mailing list be used for the purpose?] > > > > I second that request; I felt exactly the same. > > since this means debian-privat, I don't agree. The discussion is about DM, so > DMs and DM candidates can't follow it. No, it doesn't mean debian-private. That would be an existing solution, but I think what is suggested is to create a new mailinglist, open for subscription by anyone, which is not publicly archived. I think this is indeed a good idea, because if DDs want to "veto" (or whatever you call it) a DM request, there shouldn't be a barrier like this. When such a list is created, we should take care to explicitly note to all subscribers that publicizing archives of that list is not allowed. Otherwise I'm sure there will be some server making the archives for us, which makes the whole operation meaningless. Thanks, Bas -- I encourage people to send encrypted e-mail (see http://www.gnupg.org). If you have problems reading my e-mail, use a better reader. Please send the central message of e-mails as plain text in the message body, not as HTML and definitely not as MS Word. Please do not use the MS Word format for attachments either. For more information, see http://pcbcn10.phys.rug.nl/e-mail.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature