Re: DM advocation for Martin-'Eric Racine
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 11:40:35AM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> On 11/26/07, Steve Langasek <email@example.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 12:25:10PM +0900, Kenshi Muto wrote:
> > > I'd like to advocate Martin-'Eric Racine <firstname.lastname@example.org> for DM.
> > > He is already under NM, T&S stage
> > > (https://nm.debian.org/nmstatus.php?email=q-funk%40iki.fi).
> > [...]
> > > I believe his knowledge about packaging is well enough as Debian
> > > maintainer
> > Can you tell me if you have reason to believe his knowledge of packaging has
> > improved since the time at which bugs #384364 and #409356 were filed?
> Steve, turning previous disagreements over those bugs into excuses is
> not gonna do.
This is not about "disagreements", these are examples of serious mistakes
you've made. We all make mistakes, what I want to know is whether you've
learned from yours.
A person who introduces a root hole in a package by setting a binary setuid
root without any peer review (including from upstream) should not be allowed
archive upload access.
A person who ignores pointers to failed build logs when they are handed to
him and insists instead that his package has no release-critical bugs should
not be allowed archive upload access.
Are you still that person?
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/