[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Miriam Ruiz advocation

* Enrico Zini <enrico@enricozini.org> [071102 13:49]:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 11:00:30AM +0100, Amaya wrote:
> > Ana Guerrero wrote:
> > > Here goes my advocate message as DM for Miriam Ruiz.
> > Ditto.
> Same here.  I've been working with Miriam on goplay, during which she
> created the game thumbnail collection and an experimental set of tags
> for parental rating of games: http://www.miriamruiz.es/tags

I wanted to advocate Miram at the same time as I was writing in about
Cameron, but refrained from doin so because I knew that there were
others who had worked with her on packages, rather than just really 
enjoying her addition to Debian through getting all those awesome games 

> > She's both technically competent and a pleasure to work with. 
> Couldn't say it better.  If there is one reason for Miriam not to be a
> DM, is that IMO it's a work-around: she should instead be a DD, and
> should have been one for quite a while now.

Funny, I wanted to say the same thing about Cameron. But I guess people
think that asking NMs for formal proofs of the problem of migrating an
optimal set of packages to testing as a np-complete problem is
appropriate way to discourage anyone from being a useful contributor to
the project so we need to route around them.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: