On Sat, 2006-01-07 at 08:08 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > Exactly. And, please correct me if I got it wrong, you were arguing that the > FD check done after the AM report is good enough for the DAM to just have a > cursory glance over the report before approving it. And that "two hours" is > a through check. > > I don't agree with either idea. Where's the incongruency? If I understand you correctly, you think that after many weeks (!) of AM checking, plus your 8 hours to write an AM report; then a 8-10 hours FD check is mandated plus a full DAM screening? FD should spend an entire working day on checking the report about one applicant and his AM? And even then the DAM should repeat that work? I think that's a tiny bit overdone. Thijs
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part