Matthew Palmer <mpalmer@debian.org> writes: [module based NM checks] > If I were to assess an applicant in the manner I described above, I would > almost certainly structure the report differently, and would most likely not > have separate P&P/T&S stages (which would mangle the report, *and* make it > impractical to properly use the AM/applicant page on nm.d.o). Well, nm.d.o is there to help tracking of the application, it's not something that *must* be used. The format of the report is a suggestion, if it doesn't work for you, use something else. As long as there's some sort of a short overview and a full report, it's fine. > I'd possibly be willing to take on a new applicant and assess them under > this scheme, if there's a reasonable expectation that my applicant wouldn't > be unduly disadvantaged by the use of a very different assessment scheme. Just ask Joerg and me before you do something. We're quite happy if we don't have to read the same answers over and over again :) Marc -- BOFH #353: Second-sytem effect.
Attachment:
pgpERAa55jG2W.pgp
Description: PGP signature