Re: Advocate check-list
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 10137 March 1977, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>
> > wanted to do this for months but never got around to it, so I asked
> > Joerg today if he can prepare something. However, I feel it might be
> > good to do some brainstorming first so we can come up with a list of
> > things to put into this check-list.
>
> So for the first thoughts, more to follow:
> - Applicant needs to already have some work done for Debian.
> A packager at least one package, a translator continues work on
> translating $stuff in Debian, etc.
> - Applicant needs at least a basic knowledge how things work. The more
> the better. He should have read policy at least once IMO. devel-ref
> too.
> - If he is a packager he should have shown good work with his packages
> and bugs. Means - no open bugs without any comment for a long
> timeframe.
- Applicant's work on Debian should be familiar to the Advocate
(ideally by sponsoring or direct interaction.)
- Applicant should have a basic knowledge of how the NM process works
and what the Applicant is in for.
[and perhaps the obvious:]
- Advocate agrees that Applicant could|should become a Debian
Developer
Don Armstrong
--
She was alot like starbucks.
IE, generic and expensive.
-- hugh macleod http://www.gapingvoid.com/batch3.htm
http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
Reply to: